1. At around 03:00 on February 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed theft with a vehicle key located in the west by the victim in the Emnoga room operated by Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon by the victim D; (b) while driving a F rocketing car equivalent to KRW 4 million at the market price owned by the victim.

2. On February 10, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car without a driver’s license from around 03:00 to around 05:00, the same place to around 1218, Daejeon Jung-ro, Jung-ro, Daejeon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the statutes on the register of driver's licenses;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, subparagraph 1 of Article 152 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act, and the choice of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Among concurrent offenders, the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act / [the scope of recommending punishment] / thief crime group, theft (type 2), basic area, imprisonment with prison labor for six months or from one year and six months [decision of sentenced] Two times a fine of the same kind (thief) in prison for four months, two times a fine of the same kind (thief, non-licensed driving) in prison, one time a fine of different types, 1.5 million won in repayment (the fine of no penalty for damage recovery) in one time a fine of different types in prison, and one time a fine of 1.5 million won in full (the fine of no penalty for damage recovery) was hospitalized with the full bench, and was detained after a detention warrant was issued due to lack of communication methods such as an excursion ship, but it was not clearly explained that a third party who kept a considerable amount of money for the recovery of damage was forced to contact with it.