beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.01.15 2015나7493

배당이의

Text

1. The plaintiff's successor's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff’s Intervenor.

purport.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is the same as that of the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it can be cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act as it is.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the appeal by the plaintiff succeeding intervenor is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.