beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2014.04.10 2014고단83

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was engaged in driving cars BM 520.

1. On September 28, 2013, the Defendant driven the said two-lane of the car from the mother mountain street located in the Masan-dong, Masan-si on the direction of fostering the two-lane of the two-lane of the road from the agriculture examination distance at an insular speed.

In such a case, although a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to maintain the safety distance with the motor vehicle running ahead and to safely drive the motor vehicle, he/she neglected to do so and failed to discover a DNA car of the victim C (SM 520) who is in the same lane traffic at the same lane as that of the motor vehicle driving by negligence, and received the back part of the above RM 520 vehicle's front part of the motor vehicle driving.

As a result, the Defendant suffered salt ties, tensions, etc. from the above victim to the victim E (the 40-year-old passenger) who is the passenger of the above Liber car, about three weeks of medical treatment, and had the victim E (the 40-year-old passenger) receive cryp tensions and tensions requiring medical treatment. At the same time, the above Liber car was damaged to the 1,829,597 won for repairing expenses, but failed to immediately stop and stop the car and escape without taking necessary measures such as providing relief to the victim.

2. At around September 28, 2013, the Defendant was running in the direction of a ero-ray in accordance with the first road of the ero-ray prior to the SM 520 vehicle, when the F, who observed the accident while flying in the accident, was driving and stiffing the G K, and the Defendant was driving in the direction of the above SM 520 vehicle at the right side of the above MM 520 vehicle. However, the Defendant did not find the ero-ray of the victim H, who was parked on the front road of the above SM 520 vehicle and was negligent in driving the vehicle without looking at the front and rear ero-ray while driving the vehicle at the same time.

For this reason, the defendant's repair cost is the truck.