2. However, the market price of the stolen object due to the instant crime is a relatively small amount of 8.30,000 won, and the above objects were returned to the victim, and the Defendant shows an attitude against his mistake.

However, not only the defendant repeats the same crime but also commits the crime of this case during the repeated crime period due to the same crime, and the defendant brought the victim's upper things in the vinyl paper prepared in advance at the time of the crime of this case, and in light of the above method of crime, it is difficult to regard it as contingent crime in light of the above method of crime, and in light of all the sentencing conditions of the arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, method of crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable.

3. The appeal of this case by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the appeal of this case is without merit.