However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On August 26, 2012, at around 02:40 on August 26, 2012, the Defendant: (a) opened a bridge installed on the entrance of the victim C in Busan Dong-gu, Busan; (b) opened the entrance, and intruded into the victim’s house by means of the victim’s collection plan; and (c) cut off the 875,000,000,000,000, in total, of the market price of the 300,000,000 won and the 25,000,000,000, in the shape of the physical pattern, and the 40,000,00,000, in the market price.

2. Around 01:00 on October 13, 2012, the Defendant intruded the victim’s house through the victim’s house located in Busan Jung-gu, Busan-gu, and did not correct window, and owned cash of KRW 400,000,000, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 500,000, and KRW 800,000, and 300,000,000, in total, of KRW 2,000,00, market price of KRW 2,000,000, and KRW 80,000,000.

3. On October 23, 2012, at around 23:00, the Defendant intruded into the house through the open gate located in Busan Jung-gu, Busan, and stolen the victim’s name and influor, who was suffering from the dried Drill as soon as possible in front of the entrance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of police statement concerning E and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the first offense, the recovery of most damaged goods, and the reflective fact);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 333 (1) of the Criminal Act for return;