However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 16:40 on October 4, 2017, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle with B investment without the driver's license in approximately 20km section of about 135 km from the 35-ro 56-18-ro, Seogu, Seogu, Seogu, Seogu, Daegu, to the movable property hospital located in Daegu, Seogu, Seo-gu, to the fourth 20-km.

"2018 Highest 1119"

1. Around 17:50 on March 8, 2018, the Defendant driven a low-pollution vehicle with a vehicle driver’s license in a section of approximately 250 km in the front of the road No. 94 in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Seoul around 17:50 on March 8, 201.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation shall operate any motor vehicle on the road, which is not mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated a passenger car with the highest investment that was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 2544"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A driver's license inquiry letter 2018 high group 1119;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Investigative into the driver's license ledger and mandatory insurance;

1. Application of the statutes governing photographs at the time of crackdown;

1. Subparagraph 1 of Article 154 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act and the main sentence of Article 8 of the same Act (the operation of an automobile which is not mandatory insurance);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: The fact that each of the crimes of this case was committed even though the person had been punished several times due to drinking driving and unlicensed driving, etc., and the circumstances that are favorable to the considerable distance of driving without obtaining a license for automobile insurance is highly likely to be subject to criticism: the defendant is committed against all of the crimes of this case, and recently, the vehicle of this case is against the defendant.