However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

"2017 Highest 267"

1. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 2017. 7. 3. 18:46 경 정읍시 B 부근에서, ‘ 윷놀이 도박을 한다.

“Around 112, “A police box affiliated with the police station C of Jung-dong Police Station C, which was called out after receiving a 112 report, shall report D, who was aware of the fact that the police box was affiliated with the police station C of Jung-dong Police Station C, which was called out, and during ascertaining the field of the situation.”

While taking a bath, such as “I ambling,” the chest part of the above D was tight once, and the ambling part was boomed twice by hand, and the police officer’s public peace and security and legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the report case was interfered with.

"2017 Highest 305"

2. On May 17, 2017, the Defendant, in violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving), driven a coo motor vehicle into E without obtaining a driver’s license from the front of the main apartment road in the hydro-Eup-Myeon of fixed Eup to the front of the 840 km-dong, Jung-dong, Jung-dong, Jung-gu, Seoul, without obtaining a driver’s license from around 1km-dong.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 267"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Photographs "2017 Highest 305";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with the performance of official duties), Article 152 Subparag. 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Act, the main sentence of Article 59(1) of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc. is that the Defendant has been punished several times due to violent and traffic crimes, the Defendant’s motive and assaulting the police officer who is on duty to wear his uniform, and the crime of this case that obstructs his duties is poor, and the Defendant’s unfavorable sentencing conditions and the Defendant’s mistake against the Defendant’s perception and mistake.