However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. 재물손괴 피고인은 2014. 6. 18. 18:50경 상주시 B 앞길에서 C가 D 무쏘밴 화물차를 운전하여 피고인의 집 앞 길을 지나간다는 이유로 화가 나 곡괭이 자루로 위 C의 처인 피해자 E 소유인 위 화물차 유리창, 범퍼, 백미러 등을 내리쳐 수리비가 6,290,415원이 들 정도로 손괴하였다.

2. In the above time, at the above time and place, the Defendant: (a) caused damage to the cargo vehicle from the victim C (the age of 65) to the victim; (b) caused the victim’s brue to “this brue”; and (c) caused the victim’s knife twice by the flue bruen, so that approximately two weeks of treatment is needed to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. [Scope of Recommendation] General Injury [the person subject to special mitigation] [the person subject to special mitigation] of the mitigation area (two to one year] of the mitigation area (the treatment of multiple offenses] of two to one year [the decision of sentence] of the defendant, although there are criminal records of the same kind for the defendant, the defendant agreed that the defendant would have reached a full agreement with the victim C. In addition, in consideration of the defendant's age, character, character and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc.