게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
Joint Defendant B is a unemployment of “D Gameland” game room in Changwon-si’s counter and underground 1st to 24:00 each day. Joint Defendant E is a person in charge of weekly operation who exercises overall control over the operation of the above game hall from 00:00 to 12:00 each day. Joint Defendant F is a person in charge of night operation who exercises overall control over the operation of the above game hall. Defendant A is an employee in charge of exchanging the above game from 10:00 to 22:00 each day. Joint Defendant G is an employee in charge of exchanging the game in the above game from 22:00 each day, from 22:00 to 10:00 each day after the next day, to provide customers with a game product with contents different from the rating of customers and to exchange the result obtained through the use of the game product.
1. The Defendant Co-Defendant B, E, F, and G (referred to as “joint Defendants” of this fourth) offered game water use different from the rated contents. From August 10, 2017 to August 30, 2017, according to the above public offering, a separate game score settlement has been created so that users of the game products can verify accumulated points (money exchange points) obtained differently from the rated contents, and 40 game apparatuses, such as “locks” and “bruk showk” were installed so that the total input amount of the game in question and total money exchange scores can be verified, and multiple unspecified customers who found the same place put in the game in the game in the above machine and obtain scores according to the game screen.
As a result, the Defendant and the joint Defendants conspired to provide game water different from the rating content.
2. According to the above public offering, the Defendant and the co-defendants of the money exchange business with the result of using the game water are allowed to perform the game in question to many unspecified customers as above at the date and place mentioned in paragraph 1, and they are jointly Defendant E.