However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal power] On January 17, 201, the Defendant issued a summary order of 700,000 won of a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Ulsan District Court on January 17, 201, and a summary order of 1.5 million won of a fine at the Ulsan District Court on August 22, 2013 as a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

【Criminal Facts】

On August 2, 2014, at around 03:18, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at 0.11% of blood alcohol concentration, driven a D-to-pur-car and proceeded along two lanes in front of the F. E in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, along the Gu consul-distance distance from the port of Ulsan-gun. When the Defendant neglected to remove waste from the two-lane above, the Defendant received the back portion of the G operator’s freight vehicle for the removal of H waste, which was temporarily stopped, in order to remove waste from the two-lane above, due to negligence when he neglected to do so.

In conclusion, the Defendant caused the death of the victim I (the age of 25) who was accompanied by the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle due to the above occupational negligence at K Hospital located in Ulsan-gu J at around 05:01 on the same day from the treatment to the low blood shock.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning G or L;

1. A traffic accident report, traffic accident report (1 and 2), on-site photograph, and on-site photograph;

1. Report on detection of a drinking driver, report on the circumstances of a drinking driver, inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving, and the ledger of use of a drinking measuring instrument;

1. A report on the occurrence of, and suggestion on, a death certificate, a photograph of a person who has suffered a change in a traffic accident;

1. Investigation report (referring to the attachment, etc. of video CDs with respect to the official application of the Radmark mark), results of handling defense accidents, and suggestion for direction;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as criminal records, investigation reports (a copy of summary orders concerning the same kind of criminal records), and copies of summary orders;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 148-2(1)1 and Article 44 of the Road Traffic Act.