beta
(영문) 전주지방법원정읍지원 2019.06.12 2016가합221

공사대금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 71,481,00 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from May 12, 2016 to June 12, 2019.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 13, 2015, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Defendant and C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) and entered into a contract with the Nonindicted Company, and entered into a contract with the Nonindicted Company for the construction of a new construction of a DNA-based D-based D-based D-based D-based D-based D-based D-based D-based D-based D-based (value-added Tax Separate), and entered into a contract with the Nonindicted Company during the construction period from July 13, 2015 to August 13, 2015, and changed the contract into KRW 570,000 (value-added Tax Separate) on August 21, 2015. (2) The Defendant paid KRW 145,00,000 in total as the construction price under the contract entered in the preceding paragraph with the Nonindicted Company, and the Nonindicted Company renounced the construction work on October 2015.

B. On November 11, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s conclusion of the construction contract and the preparation of a written contract, etc. (1) The Plaintiff entered into with the Defendant on November 11, 2015, and the remainder of the construction repair work (hereinafter “instant construction work”).

(i) 363,00,000 won (including value added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply) for the cost of construction;

2) The construction contract under the contract is concluded (hereinafter “instant construction contract”).

The details of the classification are 1 contract specifications, 2 contract specifications, additional tax rates (the commencement of construction work according to the estimate for the renovation of construction).

1. Details of contracts;

2. Non-payment one total amount on the date of payment for the amount classified into the terms of payment: 30,000,000 won 2 down payment 50,000,000 won on November 11, 2015; 40% remaining 40% at the time of arrival of materials on December 30, 2015 after the appraisal of intermediate payment 3: 40% remaining 280,000,000 won on December 30, 2015;

3.(1) If the “B” (Plaintiff) fails to complete the delivery within the term of the contract, it shall pay to “A” a delay compensation equivalent to 3/1000 of the daily contract amount per day for each day of delay.

2) With respect to the instant construction contract with the Defendant, the Plaintiff drafted two contracts (Evidence A (Evidence A (Evidence A) and B (Evidence A (Evidence A)) with respect to the instant construction contract, and the contract was signed (Evidence B (Evidence B (Evidence B) and 7).