A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A in the net City D, “50 showers 50 and 20 showers 20 game rooms” were operated in the name of “E Game site”, and Defendant B served as the chief of the management office of the above game site.

No one shall provide for the distribution or use of game products with contents different from those of game products classified by the Game Water Rating Board, or display or keep for such purposes, and shall exchange, exchange, arrange for exchange or repurchase of the tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products for business purposes.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired with each other from October 30, 2013 to December 5, 2013, and operated a game hall by purchasing 10,000 won aconon by purchasing 10,000 won aconon by paying 10,00 won acon for the following: (a) animation of background differently from the contents of the deliberation in the above game site; (b) providing 20 instances of “Cheonghae Game”, which was opened and altered so as to make it available to unspecified customers after the exemplary appearance; and (c) providing customers with 10,00 won acon.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to offer many and unspecified customers with “to-beer game machine” with the same function as shown in the rating classification, unlike the game water, and the Defendants engaged in the business of re-purchase of chophones equivalent to the points obtained through the game.

Summary of Evidence

Article 44(1) of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry as well as Article 44(1) of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry for the following reasons: F of the Defendant’s partial statement by law; F of the suspect interrogation protocol by the prosecution against G; F of the respective protocol of the prosecutor’s statement by the prosecution against G; F of the respective protocol of the prosecutor’s statement by the prosecution against G; list of seizure; photograph 16; photograph 18; and evidence of business report by the Defendant.