However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On June 18, 2014, the Defendant’s insultd the Defendant on the street in front of “3.8 manpower” located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, 19:00.

“A person who is requested to return home from the victim D of the situation belonging to the Daejeon Police Station C District of the Daejeon Police Station who was called upon 112 report, and the number of neighboring residents was heard, and the victim made a public insult of the victim “the victim was sexually insulting, 60 times the head of the district, and the chrone “the victim was sexually insulting,” and “the victim was sexually insulting.”

2. The Defendant was divingd on the street at the above date, time, and at the same place as above, and used D’s protective measures to protect the players belonging to the Daejeon Police Station C District, Daejeon, to take a bath as prescribed in paragraph 1, and used the above D’s clock as “C’s clock for creative damage, and as soon as possible, it opened the front door of the patrol car to the said D, and used the said D’s clock to take off the patrol car one time by hand, etc.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties on the handling of 112 reports and the protection of the host.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act;