beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.09.05 2014고단975

공무집행방해등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From February 15, 2014, Defendant A: (a) around 10:00, the victim E’s “F restaurant” operated by Seopo-si, Seopo-si; (b) while smoking tobacco while smoking, the victim stated that “the victim shall not be allowed to take out tobacco as a non-smoking area inside a restaurant”; and (c) the victim “I am sing away from this string, hinging off, hinging off, hinging off, hinging off, hinging off, hinginging off, hinging off, hinging off, hinging off, and hing off,” and interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force for about three hours, such as hinging down, and hinginging down the table.

2. 공무집행방해(피고인들) 피고인 A는 같은 날 13:30경 제1항 기재 식당에서 위와 같이 소란을 피우던 중, 112 신고를 받고 출동한 서귀포경찰서 G지구대 소속 경찰관 경장 H이 이를 말리자 “개 새끼야, 내가 뭘 잘못했느냐, 너 몇 살이냐, 그냥 신경 꺼 씹할 놈아, 이 새끼 웃기는 새끼네”라고 욕설을 하면서 H의 멱살을 잡아 밀치고, 피고인 B, C은 이에 가세하여 H의 멱살을 잡고 몸을 밀치고, 옷을 잡아당기는 등 폭행함으로써, 공모하여 경찰공무원의 신고사건 처리 등에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to E, H and I;

1. Written statements prepared by J and K;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Articles 314(1), 136(1), and 30 of the Criminal Act (a)

B. Defendant B and C: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Code

(c) Selection of punishment: Selection of each penalty;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes (Defendant A): The scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines for the reasons of sentencing Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Code, the obstruction of performance of official duties, the obstruction of performance of official duties, the obstruction of performance of official duties, the basic area, and six months of imprisonment.