2. There are no circumstances to consider the Defendant as favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes.

However, each of the crimes of this case by deceiving victims by deceiving them by posting a statement that the defendant sold goods and sold them on the Internet bulletin board, which led to a serious damage to the electronic commerce order of the victims in the middle and high quality of the crime. The damage caused by each of the crimes of this case has not been recovered, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and changes theory of this case, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances of each of the crimes of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc., are taken into account. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is not reasonable, since the sentence imposed by the court below is too too unreasonable, considering all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and changes theory of this case, such as the records and changes of the crime of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.