When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant, around 14:55 on June 1, 2015, talked with the victim E (5 years) and F, etc. in the office of "D," located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, about the issue of election of the president, etc., and the said victim was said to be "humbly humbly humbly humbly humbly humbly humbly humbly humbly humbly humbly humbly humblyh.

B. was a candidate.

In the phrase, “the victim is cleeped once by the victim’s left side, and the victim gets out the arms of the defendant, and the victim was quizzed to the victim who was challenged with the victim, and the victim was quizz to the 14 days for treatment between the victim and about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. A photograph of damage, witness's photograph or witness's photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (E);

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. 소송비용의 부담 형사 소송법 제 186조 제 1 항 피고인 및 변호인의 주장에 대한 판단 피고인 및 변호인은, 피고인이 E의 팔을 할퀸 것은 E이 피고인을 바닥에 넘어뜨린 채 무릎으로 피고인의 가슴부분을 누르고 목을 졸라 이에 벗어나고자 한 행동이므로 정당 방위에 해당한다고 주장한다.

판시 증거에 의하여 알 수 있는 싸움의 경위, 피고인의 행위 내용, 피해자의 상해 정도 등을 종합하여 보면, 피고인이 피해자의 팔뚝을 할퀸 행위는 피해자의 부당한 공격에 대한 소극적인 방어 행위에 불과한 것이 아니라 피해자에 대한 공격행위로 보여 정당 방위에 해당하지 않는다.

The above assertion is not accepted.