Of the facts charged in the instant case, defamation is committed.

The defendant was the representative director of the tenant representative of the C apartment house in South Korea.

On January 12, 2015, the Defendant issued at will the “1-month management fee notice” under the name of C apartment management office in the name of C apartment management office and sent it by mail to all occupants of the apartment, and made them confused with the occupants who received two notices, including the notice of management expenses sent by the existing management office, and made them confused with the management office.

Accordingly, the defendant interferes with management affairs such as issuing notice of apartment management office through fraudulent means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A notice of management expenses, a statement of appeal, etc. (a resolution was passed to dismiss the accused who was the same representative);

As long as the management regulations, which were in force on December 14, 2010, did not stipulate three times of the meeting as a reason of dismissal (Article 8-2), the resolution of dismissal against the defendant on the ground that the defendant does not constitute a ground of dismissal (Article 8-2), is null and void as a matter of course, and it is reasonable to view that the defendant deprived of the defendant's qualification and that the special election is null and void. Thus, the defendant was in the position of the chairperson of the occupants' representative meeting at the

I would like to say.

However, the management expenses are paid to the management entity (Article 45(1) of the former Housing Act), and the management entity means the management office, the representative of the autonomous management body, in the case of autonomous management, and the entrusted management entity selected in accordance with statutes and regulations, in the case of the entrusted management (Article 2 Subparag. 14). In this case, the defendant sent notice that the contract is terminated with the entrusted management entity, E Co., Ltd., which is the entrusted management entity, and the defendant sent notice of the termination of the contract. However, it is not deemed that there was a reason for termination, but at least