If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On December 9, 2012, the Defendant discovered that, around 11:50 on 11:50 on 19, 2012, the Defendant: (a) in front of modern mother car services in the Dongdong-dong-dong, the victim B’s market price was at least KRW 8 million, c that is the victim B’s market price is at least KRW 8 million, sets up a key to the car in the city and boarded the dong.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

2. At around 02:20 on November 22, 2012, the Defendant: (a) opened a door of a vehicle in front of the Hyundai Motor Service Center located in the Dong-dong, Yan-si; (b) opened the door of a vehicle not corrected for E-A-car owned by the victim D; and (c) cut off the vehicle with one net thm of the market value of KRW 8.10,000,000 in the market value; (d) one smartphone in the amount of KRW 80,000 in the market value; and (e) documents equivalent to KRW 50,000 in the market value.

Summary of Evidence

[2013 High Court Decision 276]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Details of CCTV afforestation (2013 high-level 277);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Seizure records;

1. The list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of seized articles;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (Aggravation of concurrent crimes as provided for in larceny of December 9, 2012, with heavier punishment);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;