상해등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) rendered by the court below is too unreasonable as the punishment (4 million won) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable (the defendant withdraws his assertion of mistake as to the facts on the grounds of appeal on the first trial date of the court of first instance). 2. The judgment is that the defendant recognized the facts of crime and divided the facts, and it seems that the person receiving basic living benefits could not have good economic conditions, and there are favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the fact that it appears that the Seoul Central Central Central Central Police Station was found to have excavated from the wall and restored to the wall of the damaged puntariness which he destroyed.
However, the crime of this case, such as the fact that the defendant had been punished several times of violence in the past, the crime of this case was significantly poor since the crime of this case was committed, and the damage suffered by the injured party was restored by the breath under the influence of alcohol, and the arrest of the injured party as an flagrant offender, and the police box and the police station continue to resist the disturbance and damage the public goods.
In full view of the fact that there is no evidence to see, and other various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, background and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the instant records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.
The above assertion by the defendant is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.