A Imprisonment for eight months, each of the defendants B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, as to Defendant B, the same shall apply.

1. The Defendants’ joint crime committed by the Defendants are going to report to the police after the passengers wanting to engage in sexual traffic with the remaining conditions only.

D. Defendant D, on December 12, 2015, decided that the mobile hosting program “G” in 05:00 on December 12, 2015, around 05:00, Defendant D left the victim H (n, 27 years of age) and only the terms and conditions of the mobile hosting program “G”. Defendant A, who was a mixed person under the above 502 heading, 502 heading the victim H, she first causes the victim H, and Defendant D, B, and C put the victim under the above 502 heading on the part of Defendant D, B, and C into the victim H as a broker for sexual traffic.

“Pasting,” the victim I (32) who is the husband of the victim H may receive KRW 1,50,000 if a report is filed with the police.

Finding tried to engage in sexual traffic.

80,000 won until this week and 700,000 won will be reported to the police within one week from the day of this week to Sundays.

“The victims, who were frighten and frighted, tried to cry the money, but the victims who were frighten, reported to the police.”

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly attempted to borrow money from victims, but attempted to do so.

2. On November 4, 2015, Defendant A’s sole criminal defendant used a mobile phone to the victim L, who was employed in the same way in the K restaurant located in Gu-U.S.J on November 4, 2015.

After that, while making a telephone call, the victim stolen a phone-phone with the market price of LG G4 carrying owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement concerning H, I, or L;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing telecom photographing;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. and Defendant A: In light of the contents of the facts charged under Article 6 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, it is evident that Article 6 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act applicable to the indictment has been omitted.