On August 21, 2017, 11:42 on August 21, 2017, 11:42, 2017, the personnel in charge of phishing are using one bank in the name of the party or one bank account in the name of the party or another bank account.

In order to confirm whether the deposit in the account in the name of the political party was used for the crime, 80% of the deposit and 1.5 million won of the installment savings are withdrawn and delivered to the Financial Supervisory Service employees. The defendant was issued KRW 1,100,000 from the victim in cash in accordance with the order of the employees of the singishing operations in the above name, and around 14:00 of the same day, the defendant was sent 14:0,000 to the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service by misrepresenting the victim as the central office of the Busan Dong-gu 206 Busan.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with the staff of phishing, was accused of the victim and received property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to verify transaction details;

1. The crime of this case in which the defendant involved in the relevant legal provisions of the criminal facts and Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act regarding the selection of punishment, and the reasons for sentencing of imprisonment with prison labor requires a strict punishment as " Bosinging," a representative social malicious crime. In light of the attitude of the act, such as falsely joining the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service and preparing a false document in advance at the request of the assistance staff, etc., the defendant is highly likely to commit the crime, and the defendant did not receive and deliver the money by deception to the assistance staff. However, the defendant did not return it to the victim, but did not return it to the victim. However, the defendant was punished by a fine for the same kind of crime such as Internet fraud, etc., damage to the victim at present or did not have been agreed with the victim, or received the disposition of juvenile protection case several times.