except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around July 17, 2018, the Defendant, “2019 High-class 1867,” requested the victim E to provide a brick cargo transport service at the office of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., operated by the Defendant in Gangseo-gu Busan, Busan, and the mobile phone cargo transport brokerage (D).

However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the transport fee even if the Defendant transported the above cargo due to the aggravation of the financial situation of the company with a total of 90 million won, and even if the Defendant received the transport fee from the owner of the goods, due to the circumstances of using it in paying

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, had the victim transport the cargo, and had the victim pay the transport fee of KRW 460,00 to the victim, and did not pay the transport fee of KRW 460,00 from that time to November 13, 2018, and did not pay the transport fee of KRW 12,975,00 in total by allowing the victims to transport the cargo over 35 times as stated in the attached crime list from that time.

The Defendant was a person who runs a transport business with the trade name called C in Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan Government B and operated a cargo transport business under the name of J in order to avoid seizure of profits by creditors when the financial situation of C Co. becomes worse, the Defendant registered his/her spouse as the representative of J in order to avoid seizure of profits.

At a place where it is difficult to identify the place around October 25, 2018, the Defendant: (a) “D”, a trucking company’s employees, through K, to “D”, a trucking company’s trucking business operator’s trucking business operator’s trucking business operator’s trucking service; (b) 14:00 on 14:0 on 25 October 2018, 2018; (c) 07:0 on 26 October 26, 2018; (d) operational items (weight).