If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On June 12, 2011, the defendant became aware of the victim B, who was a guest, in the frequency that the defendant works as an employee, and was paid in a personal relationship.

Defendant previously operated Smarkets.

In the context of the remaining debts due to the lending of bonds, even if no source of revenue exists and no source of revenue exists, there was no intention or ability to repay the debts from another person.

1. Around June 15, 2011, the Defendant stated that “the Defendant started the guarantee of the family-friendly relationship” to the victim at the Do motherel located in Seo-gu Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, stating that “The Defendant died of the family-friendly relationship and paid the amount of KRW 8 million to the guarantor, and his/her father and her father and son reside in the elementary school located in the Tong-gu, with KRW 30 million and KRW 5 million, and the principal principal borrowed KRW 5 million as 5 million.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not use it for its purpose, and there was no intention or ability to repay it in time due to such economic circumstances.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received money from the victim to the Busan Bank account under the name of the Defendant for the same day as the deposit money, etc.

2. On June 27, 2011, the Defendant concluded that “Around the south-gu Busan Metropolitan City E, the Defendant would complete the Plaintiff’s collection of G frequency that he had worked in the country, and would have to be repaid immediately if he would have to be settled and retire at the time when he would have to retire.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay money in time, even if he borrowed money from the victim due to such economic circumstances.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was given KRW 5 million from the victim, who was in his seat, to receive KRW 5 million as a loan.

3. The Defendant: (a) around July 20, 201, proposed “the Victim within the Felel located in Nam-gu Busan, Nam-gu, Busan; and (b) H University.