추가상병불승인처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Around 11:30 on February 22, 2016, the Plaintiff, who was employed as a daily worker in recognition and construction as a stock company, was subject to an accident where the Plaintiff was faced with the left-hand shoulder at the wall with the lower-hand shoulder by getting out of the floor bed at the site of the construction site of the Masplas Construction in Yangsan-si (hereinafter “instant accident”).
On March 21, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant, asserting that the Plaintiff sustained injury to the left-hand part of the revolving part of the revolving, and the left-hand part of the revolving part of the revolving part of the revolving part of the revolving part of the revolving part of the medical care benefits application. The Defendant approved the application for medical care benefits only to the left-hand part of the revolving part of the revolving part of the revolving part of the medical care benefits application, and
On June 30, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional medical care benefits for the injury and disease of this case with the Defendant by asserting that he/she received an additional diagnosis of the “satisfy sat satisfy satfy satfy satfy sat satfy sat (hereinafter “instant injury and disease”). On July 21, 2016, the Defendant rendered a non-approval of the Plaintiff’s application for medical care benefits for the additional injury and disease (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that there is no proximate causal link between the instant accident and the instant accident and the point of view of satch satfy sat.
[Reasons for Recognition] The entry of Evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 12, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the disposition is lawful;
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that there was a proximate causal relation between the instant accident and the instant accident, and thus, the instant disposition was unlawful.
B. After receiving the instant accident, the Plaintiff, such as the progress of the first medical treatment, filed a petition for the pain of the left-hand shoulder with the members and the members of the Dental branch. On March 2, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a petition for the pain of the left-hand shoulder and the restriction on the MO’s exercise at the B Hospital on March 3, 2016, and received the MOI inspection on March 3, 2016.