However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

In using and managing a means of access, no one shall lend the means of access while receiving, demanding or promising any compensation therefor.

Nevertheless, on May 31, 2018, the Defendant received the call from a person who has not been named on his/her name, stating that “When sending necessary documents for loans and physical cards, he/she would give approval for loans,” and accepted it. On June 5, 2018, the Defendant sent one check of the physical card connected to the credit account (Account Number: E) in the name of the Defendant by designating the recipient from around 1, 2018 to D. On June 5, 2018, and sent one check of the above account number to the person who has not been named on his/her name.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to receive intangible expected profits that can receive future loans, and lent the means of access.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a police investigation report (related to submission of a written confirmation of details of transfer of damage);

1. Relevant Article 49 (4) 2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Articles 6 (3) 2 and 6 (3) 2 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions;

1. 집행유예 형법 제62조 제1항 양형의 이유 피고인의 체크카드가 보이스피싱 범죄에 이용되어 피해자가 300만 원을 편취당하는 피해가 발생한 점, 아직까지 그 피해가 회복되지 아니한 점을 고려하여 징역형을 선택하되, 피고인이 이 사건 범행을 통해 실제로 얻은 이익은 없는 점, 대출빙자 사기조직의 꾐에 빠져 체크카드를 넘겨준 것으로 밝혀져 참작할 사정이 있는 점, 종전에 금고 이상의 처벌을 받은 전력이 없는 점, 피고인의 나이와 성행, 경제적 형편 등을 종합하여 형의 집행을 유예함. 이상의 이유로 주문과 같이 판결한다.