However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Around 00:40 on January 5, 2020, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim B (the age of 48) committed the crime of “D key points in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, A” (the victim B, who was seated on the next table table, and the victim, who tried to see the victim’s disease on the ground that the victim B and the scambed scam, who were dangerous in the table table, were able to see the victim’s face, and the victim was able to undergo approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant committed the crime against the Victim F (AF), at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1) of the above Article, the victim F was able to see the Defendant, and the victim F was able to see the Defendant, and the victim’s f was fluoral disease, which is a dangerous thing, and the victim’s flussium was fluor

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to B and G;

1. Statement of each police statement to F and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site photographs, death diagnosis reports, and investigation reports (Attachment of photographs of damage);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the following sentencing grounds) was that the Defendant, who was a dangerous object, inflicted each injury on the victims, as the main offender.

In light of the fact that the defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for the same kind of crime in the past, the victim was injured by a dangerous object, and the risk was not high, the defendant showed an attitude against the victim, the victim B showed an attitude against the victim, the victim B was the victim, and the victim was different from the defendant, and the victims did not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the victims.