When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

[2015 High 4321] On December 21, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the above restaurant business by 20 minutes by force, such as: (a) in the C cafeteria located in Busan High-gu, Busan High-gu, Busan High-gu, and (b) in the presence of other customers, who walked with the trial cost, and prevented the victim D from departing from the trial cost.

[2015 High Court Decision 4443]

1. On March 9, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s convenience store business by force, such as: (a) within the “F convenience store” located in Busan District, Busan District, on March 17:20, 2015; (b) without any particular reason, having the victim G, an employee of the Defendant take a bath, “Isk and Chewing flachi,” and having the victim G, an employee, take a disturbance for about 15 minutes; and (c) having them return to the said place, thereby obstructing the victim’s convenience store business.

2. The Defendant assaulted the Victim at one time, on the ground that the Victim G (26 years) said Defendant is frightening, on the date, time, place, and place described in paragraph 1, and that the Victim G (26 years) said Defendant was frightened.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 High Court Decision 4321]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A report on investigation (Attachment toCCTVs) (hereinafter referred to as 2015 Highest 4443);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the police statement protocol to G;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with each business), Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;