If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Defendant

B and the victim C came to know that they were in the online game, and the defendant had resided in the victim's house, one week a week.

1. 절도 피고인은 2012. 3. 31. 22:00경 화성시 D빌라 A동 103호에서 집주인인 피해자가 외출한 틈을 타서 반지 14K 시가 270,000원 상당, 일만원권 1장, 오천원권 3장, 잔돈 50,000원 상당, 기업은행 통장 1점, 국민은행 통장 1점, 핸드폰(SKT, 햅틱) 1점 도합 345,000원 상당을 절취하였다.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Utilization, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc., by having the game items amounting to KRW 4.50,00 as the Defendant’s account, after having access to the said part of the said part of the said part of the said part of the said part of the said part of the game site to another Internet game site

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 329 of the Criminal Act that selects punishment, Article 729 of the Criminal Act, Articles 72 (1) 1 and 48 (1) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Influence of information and communications networks and choice of fines);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;