For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged and sentenced the Defendant to five years of imprisonment, and ordered the child-related institutions, such as child and juvenile-related institutions, and welfare facilities for the disabled to restrict employment for each seven years.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by violating the principle of no accusation regarding the imposition of employment restriction orders

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.