The sentencing of the court below (one year of imprisonment, additional collection) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In light of the fact that the Defendant made confession of all of the crimes of this case, and the fact that the crime of this case was committed once a philopon simply, is favorable to the Defendant, or that the Defendant was punished for a total of 10 times, including the fact that he was punished three times for the same crime. In particular, the Defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and two months for the same crime, and in light of the sentencing of the same similar case, the lower court appears to have determined the punishment by taking into account the motive and background of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, etc., and considering the various circumstances that are favorable to the Defendant, the sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.