beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2012.03.14 2011고정2437

사문서위조등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[201-fixed 2437] On August 26, 2010, the Defendant, at around 14:00, opened a mobile phone in the name of the C mobile phone sales store located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and forged one copy of the application for new mobile phone service in the name column of D, resident registration number column, E, and fee claim column, without authority, with the intention to exercise the right and duty by stating that the application for new mobile phone service in the name of D, E, E, and 319 is a private document for the purpose of exercising the right and duty, and exercised it as if the said C company G were a document duly formed.

[2011 High Court Decision 2438]

1. On November 17, 2010, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) around 17:00 on November 17, 2010, entered the name column of the application form for new entry of mobile phones kept at H in the Nam-si H, Namyang-si, in order with J, the resident registration number column, K and the claim form for charges, and signed it with J in the applicant column.

For the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged two copies of an application for joining a mobile phone, which is a private document concerning the rights and obligations under J’s name, by the said method.

2. At the above temporary location, the Defendant issued an application for joining a mobile phone in the name of J as if the application form for joining a forged mobile phone was a document that was duly formed, and exercised the same.

3. On November 17, 2010, even if the Defendant was delivered a mobile phone to M at the above place on November 17, 2010, the Defendant did not intend to use the mobile phone to pay the fee, ability, or penalty.

Nevertheless, in the same way as paragraph (1), the J-owned driver's license is presented and the false statement was presented to "to purchase two mobile phones in the name of third village", and it was issued from the victim M who believed it to be true, i.e., the amount equivalent to 9.60,000 won per market value from the ggal jus jus jus jus

b)a summary of the evidence;