If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

No one may intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator, or provide such services for communications of a third party.

Nevertheless, on December 2017, the Defendant: (a) made a pre-paid phone to be used for public relations; (b) 20,000 won per page; (c) the Defendant, who was unable to know the name in the mid-to long-term radius (htp://fceok.com).

On December 2017, 2017, after reporting the content of “the above bulletin,” the above bulletin was sent to the above bulletiner, and the mobile phone agent located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government opened three of the prepaid chips (B, C, and D) after carrying 40,000 won to the mobile phone agent’s employees, and the above statement was sent to the person whose name was unknown at the seat.

Accordingly, the defendant provided telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for the purpose of telecommunications.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A report on internal investigation (attaching contents of suspect E mobile phone phones);

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to Korean cable telecom reply form, SK Telecom reply form;

1. Article 97 of the relevant Act and Articles 97 and 30 of the Telecommunications Business Act concerning criminal facts as well as the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;