손해배상(의)
1. The plaintiff's part of the lawsuit against the defendant medical corporation C seeking the confirmation of bankruptcy claims shall be dismissed.
2. The plaintiff.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On January 21, 2013, around 18:24, 2013, the Plaintiff complained of symptoms, such as double drums, drums, and Gutoto, and applied to the Fa Hospital operated by the Defendant medical corporation C (hereinafter “Defendant corporation”).
B. Defendant D, a doctor of the Defendant hospital, began with 4 to 5 hours ago from the Plaintiff, and had a minor sense of pain prior to the latest one week, and had been faced with her head. However, there was no special symptoms thereafter, Defendant D, a doctor of the Defendant hospital, confirmed that the Plaintiff’s state of consciousness was clear, and that the Plaintiff’s state of consciousness was stable, such as blood pressure, beer, respiratory, and physical temperature was conducted as a result of an examination to verify active signs against the Plaintiff, and confirmed that there was no abnormal disorder, and that there was no previous diagnosis and examination on the Plaintiff, based on these conditions of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff performed the examination to verify the Plaintiff’s symptoms, such as blood pressure, beer, respiratory, respiratory, and physical temperature, and that the Plaintiff was in a stable state, and that there was no abnormal disorder. Based on these circumstances of the Plaintiff, Defendant D, a doctor of the Defendant hospital, a doctor of the Defendant hospital, was to perform the said examination and examination on the Plaintiff’s blood tension, and to perform the said examination and examination on the Plaintiff’s progress.
3) However, at around 19:20 on the same day, the Plaintiff had discussed one time and showed changes in food, and the symptoms of telegraphic occupation were revealed. Accordingly, Defendant D, a guardian of the Plaintiff, was to test brain computerized single-rises to B and G (CT; hereinafter referred to as “brain shooting test”).
I explained that it is necessary to do so, and conducted brain CTR tests with the consent thereto.
Defendant D found the Plaintiff’s opinion on cerebrovascular as a result of the examination of brain shooting and explained it to B, and sought to transfer the Plaintiff to the third medical institution.