At around 00:50 on June 9, 2020, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by bringing one box of KRW 100,000,00 at the market price that was filled up by the victim C, which was operated by the victim C, in Michuhol-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, in a crepan of the surveillance negligence; and (b) committed a theft of the property owned by the victims in total nine times in nine times in the same manner as the list of crimes in the attached Table, from June 28, 2020.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each written statement by the police concerning the defendant's legal statement E, F, G, C, H, I, J, K, L, and M;

1. The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph photographs of the warehouse entrance doors, which have been destroyed in the investigation report (the counter investigation of the victims), the investigation report (the confirmation of the opening hours in the case of special theft), photographics, field photographic photographs, photographs of the CCTV screen pictures before and after the criminal suspect committed, photographs of the CCTV screen screen pictures, photographic images of the DNA screen, taken out, cellular images inside and outside a cafeteria, photographs of the DNA screen taken, photographs of the collected bank and cellular phones, photographs of the CCTV screen screen taken, photographs taken, photographs of the CCTV screen screen inside and outside a cafeteria, photographs taken, photograph of the Q restaurant image screen, photo taken, photo taken out in the front of the closed commercial building, photo taken out, photo taken out in the Q restaurant screen, photo taken out in the front of the closed commercial building, and photo taken out;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 329, 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 331 (1) of the Criminal Act, each of which is applicable to facts constituting an offense, and the choice of punishment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50(1)3 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders are disadvantageous to the reasons for sentencing: A crime is not good in light of the following: (a) the Defendant committed a theft of the victims’ property repeatedly in a short period of time due to a method that intrudes upon a shop other than a person in operation; and (b) the Defendant had the record of having been punished several times due to the same kind of crime.

Defendant.