Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

1. On December 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 18:00, the Defendant: (b) reported that the Defendant was only a F F Franchi driveed by the Victim E in front of the D shop located in Chungcheongnam-gun Hong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; (c) the Defendant, who was aware of India, caused the Defendant’s vehicle owned by the victim by drinking the part of the said vehicle with a complaint as to the entry of the victim into the vehicle on a narrow channel where the victim had a lot of traffic; and (d) made it possible for the Defendant to pay repair costs equivalent to KRW 1,424,80,08, such as dap plates, painting, etc., and then, damaged the vehicle owned by the victim.

2. On December 9, 2016, at the same place as Paragraph 1, around 18:30 on December 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) took a shelter from a police officer belonging to the Chungcheongnam-nam Hongdong Police Station G District; (b) took a bath to “shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot snas; and (c) threatened the Defendant with a view to

The defendant was arrested as the current offender of interference with the performance of official duties due to the above intimidation and was transferred to the G District in 18:50 on the same day, and the defendant was urged from the slopeJ belonging to the said G District to receive medical treatment from the 119 first aid unit on the face of the defendant. The defendant expressed that the defendant "I am shot in the 119 first aid unit on the face of the above G District," and assaulted the J slope's flap with the flap of the J slope, such as skeing the flap of the J slope, and walking the right blap of the J slope once.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the management in a global class, such as the handling of police officers' 112 reports and the management of a flagrant offender.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E, J, H, and K;

1. Application of the written estimate of photographic and general repair costs to a camera image;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, for the crime;

1. The reasons for sentencing of Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act for the aggravation of concurrent crimes are as follows.