beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.05.03 2017고단7051

공용물건손상등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 7051"

1. On August 1, 2017, the Defendant damaged property: (a) aboard and finding a taxi at the parking lot for the Do box located in Incheon Strengthening Forces C around 06:40 on August 1, 2017; (b) and (c) the police box to which he belongs to E while serving in the situation.

“ ......” However, as the Party refuses the inquiry, the market value managed by the above police box, which was deep to the T, was damaged by extracting the U.S. S. red 15 oil 15 oil in his/her hand.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, damaged the equipment for public use, in his hand, the location of the electricity used for the supply of electricity to the front signboards of a police box for the same reason as that set forth in paragraph 1.

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, on the same ground as the date and time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, and on the same ground as stated in paragraph 1, assaulted by the police officer E, who was assigned to the police box, once again, on one occasion by sending the back part of the guard E, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of his duties

The defendant of "2017 Highest 7152" is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle of Galburged G.

On August 2, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.147% in blood around 09:30 on August 2, 2017, and continued to turn to the left at a speed that would not be known one-lane in front of the shooting distance in the Incheon Family Park, which is located in only 151-1, Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon.

In this case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by complying with the signal.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left at the left as it was due to the negligence of the Defendant’s failure to turn to the left, and the victim H, who was driven by the straight line on the opposite side of the running direction of the Defendant, was shocked by the front panion of the vehicle of soften, which was driven by the victim H.