However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2016. 9. 10. 05:10경 수원시 영통구 B건물 앞 노상에서 술에 취한 채 잠을 자던 중, “술이 취한 남자분이 대자로 누워있다.”라는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 수원남부경찰서 C지구대 소속 순경 D으로부터 “선생님 댁이 어디십니까 , 여기서 주무시면 안 됩니다.”라는 말을 듣고 “알아서 간다고”라고 말하였으나 재차 D이 “선생님 일어나서 귀가하시는 것을 보고 떠나겠습니다.”라고 말한 것에 화가 나 “한번 해보자는 거야, 이 친구 나한테 뒤질라고”라며 오른손으로 D의 목 부위를 1회 가격하고, 손으로 D의 목을 조르는 등 폭행하여 위 경찰관의 치안유지에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Social Service Order [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (6 months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the decision of sentence] [decision of sentence] The fact that the defendant is not good in light of the contents of the crime in this case, the fact that the defendant's mistake is deeply divided, the criminal records due to the defendant's like or drinking, the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and all the various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments in this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, motive and circumstance before and after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.