물품대금
1. As to KRW 34,298,00 and KRW 6,446,00 among the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 12,474,00 from September 30, 2017.
1. There is no dispute between the parties to the determination on the cause of the claim, or comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire pleadings in each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the plaintiff supplied the defendant with each of the goods equivalent to KRW 6,446,00 on September 29, 2017, KRW 12,474,00 on October 12, 2017, KRW 540,00 on April 25, 2018, and KRW 12,540,00 on April 25, 2018, and KRW 2,838,000 on May 23, 2018, and the plaintiff is the person who received reimbursement. The remainder of KRW 6,46,00 on September 29, 2017, excluding KRW 6,46,000 on the goods paid by the plaintiff.
Therefore, with respect to KRW 34,298,00 (= KRW 6,446,00) and KRW 12,474,000 as KRW 12,540,838,000 and KRW 6,446,00 as of September 29, 2017, the following day of supply shall be from September 30, 2017; KRW 12,474,00 as of October 31, 2017; KRW 12,54,00 as of the following day of supply; KRW 12,540,00 as of April 25, 200; KRW 12,540 as of the date of supply to the Plaintiff; KRW 20,000 as of the annual interest rate of KRW 15,00,000 from September 26, 2018 to May 28, 2018; and KRW 2018,53,000.
(1) The plaintiff's claim is justified, although the plaintiff's claim for damages for delay on the date of each supply is filed, since the damages for delay occurs on the day following the date of each supply, the defendant's claim as to the plaintiff's claim is not accepted. 2. The defendant's claim as to the plaintiff's claim has significant defects in the goods supplied by the plaintiff, the plaintiff's business losses were incurred due to delay in the supply, and the plaintiff requested to replace the goods or to change the defective disposal, but the plaintiff did not comply with the claim. However, there
3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are justified.