야간건조물침입절도등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) that the court below sentenced to the defendant (No. 10 months of imprisonment and No. 1 of confiscation) is too unreasonable.
2. We examine the judgment, and consider various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, even if considering the circumstances asserted by the Defendant on the grounds of appeal, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.
3. In conclusion, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, however, the part of “the choice of each imprisonment” in the last two parallels of the judgment below ex officio pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure to “the choice of each imprisonment (except for the crime of larceny of intrusiond buildings at night and of larceny of night structures).”