If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

The Defendant is a person who was previously dismissed due to frequent awareness and neglect of duty while serving as an instructor of a private teaching institute in the “C” operated by the victim B (n, 46 years of age).

1. Around 20:30 on April 13, 2020, the Defendant intruded the said private teaching institute without permission from Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D and 2nd floor “C,” and without permission from the victim in order to make a complaint against the dismissal during the previous work as an instructor of a private teaching institute.

Accordingly, the Defendant invadedd the above private teaching institute building operated by the victim.

2. In the date, time, and place of the above “paragraph 1”, the Defendant: (a) found the victim’s complaint on the ground that the victim was dismissed in connection with the operation of a private teaching institute; and (b) reported it to the Office of Education to close the door of the private teaching institute; and (c) immediately after the removal from the said private teaching institute, the Defendant sent the victim to the victim and closed the door that the victim did not comply with “the Act on the Management of Land, Infrastructure and Transport” 2.

It is intended to suspend the business after being marked a photograph;

The term "intimidating the victim" was "timidating the victim."

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. B accusation;

1. An investigation report (related to telephone conversations of a person for reference, telephone conversations of a suspect, and telephone recording file of a victim) [the defendant entered the victim's consent to resisting the dismissal method, and reported that he did not keep a social distance in order to receive an apology against the bath, so it does not constitute a crime. According to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the fact that the defendant sought the victim from the victim upon receiving notice of dismissal from the victim and demanded the victim to withdraw from the lecture room, and entered the lecture room without leaving the lecture room (Evidence No. 23, 24 of the evidence record), and reported that the victim did not keep social distance to the victim.