However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 6, 2015, at around 23:00, the Defendant heard the word “Djun” operated by the Victim C in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, that he did not provide her with urineocology while drinking her with her birth.

Accordingly, the defendant collected 500 c beer residuess for the victim, which is a dangerous thing that had been placed on the table.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each statement;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The following facts are considered as follows: (a) the extent of assault is minor in the area of special mitigation (two to one year and two months); (b) the case where the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant; (c) the case where the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant; (d) the defendant recognized the facts of the crime of this case; and (e) the defendant took an attitude against the defendant; (e) the motive and background of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, degree of assault, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, etc.; and (e) the records of this case and arguments of this case, including various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act.