When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person operating C Company, and the victim D is a business proprietor of Ulsan-gu E E located in Ulsan-gu, and the Defendant, around October 4, 2016, upon receiving KRW 1,200,000,000 out of the construction cost from the injured party, was required to make additional construction from the injured party on the fourth floor of the above public notice around 15:14,000 won.

The defendant, while making the above 4th floor corridor, he saw about 20 minutes " any longer, saw as they are, and dwarf as they are, in order to make the money installed in the air, and flaf as they are, about flaf, about 10 minutes.

“Along with the victim’s demand,” “Along with the victim’s second floor office,” “Along with the victim’s demand,” and “Along with the victim’s second floor office,” would again pay to the victim for about 30 minutes if the victim did not meet the construction or construction work;

The Ministry of Security and Public Administration has interfered with the notification of the victim by force due to the passage of noise "......."

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each prosecutor's office and police officers against the accused;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. G statements;

1. Complaint;

1. A detailed statement of the processing of reported cases;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports ( telephone conversations between complainants);

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. At the time of the instant assertion, while the Defendant had talked with the victim, there is a difference between the victim and the victim. However, the victim was the husband of the victim who was a former police officer and had a physical condition such as a month, and the victim was also the victim's high gender and the victim was the victim, and the victim was the victim himself.