2. Although it is necessary to consider equity in the case where the defendant agreed with the victim in the court of the first instance and was judged simultaneously with the judgment prior to the confirmation of the first head in the judgment, the defendant was not present at each trial in the court of the original instance and the court of the first instance, and the defendant was not present at each one time in the court of the original instance. Nevertheless, the court of the original instance brought an action to the effect that the amount of fine for a summary order (one million won) has been reduced, taking into account the above circumstances into account as much as possible, and the defendant had already filed an objection in the court of the original instance to the effect that he had already repaid 1 million won to the victim, and such change seems to have already been sufficiently reflected in the sentencing of the court of the original instance, and there are other various circumstances that are conditions for the sentencing of the case, such as the motive and background of the

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.