However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around June 14, 2009, the Defendant: (a) stated that “The Victim C was operating a 26 platform; (b) was entitled to KRW 37,500,000,000,000 for KRW 10,000,000 for KRW 30,000 for KRW 30,000 for KRW 1,40 for each month from June 14, 2009 to October 14, 2010; and (c) was transferred to the Victim C with KRW 18,70,000 for KRW 30,00 for KRW 30,00 for KRW 1,00 for each month from around October 25, 2010, the Defendant did not pay the amount to KRW 30,000 for KRW 30,00 for KRW 30,00 for KRW 30,00 for KRW 1,00 for KRW 30.

Nevertheless, on October 25, 2010, the Defendant enticed the victim by means of pretending that the Defendant is operating a normally, such as not knowing the fact that the 30 million won mold was broken, etc., and received 1.1 million won from the victim as a deposit money around November 10, 2010, and then acquired 9 million won in total on seven occasions from around that time to April 5, 201, as shown in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of a detailed statement of passbook transactions, a detailed statement of passbook transactions, and statutes on account transactions;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 347 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the suspended execution is above the extent of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant makes a confession of and reflects against the crime, the amount of damage does not exceed the amount of damage, and only one time before and