공갈등
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
A victim E made a statement in the court of the court below to the effect that “When the defendant shows the details reported to the government office and acted as if he did not appear well, E did not demand the payment of the food value by drinking,” the victim E is guilty of a crime of conflict against the defendant’s act.
In light of the fact that the Defendant continuously reported the victim D’s work site to the Gu office from April 25, 2014 to March 8, 2015, etc., if the Defendant’s statement in the investigation agency was more reliable than the statement in the lower court’s court, and the construction work was suspended as the Defendant’s continuous civil petition system, it should be deemed as constituting “power of force” of the crime of interference with business.
There is no contradiction in the statements of the victim E and N related to the interference with the victim E's business affairs, and according to this, the defendant, upon arrival of E and N in the headline, has reported to the police about why he reported.
“ .......... .... ... ... ... ... .... ..... ..... ....... ............ ........
The sentencing of the court below (1.5 million won) which is unfair in sentencing is too unhued and unfair.
On May 1, 2015, the Defendant, who was not guilty of the facts alleged in the facts charged, was provided approximately KRW 10,000,00 for the victim E (hereinafter referred to as the “victim E”), a business owner, in the J located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, around 18:00, who had shown the details of the report on illegal business to the Gu office, and had mistakenly shown the details of the report on illegal business to the Gu office. The Defendant was provided with food equivalent to KRW 10,00,000 for the victim, who was able to engage in the business outside the snow inside the Gu office.