At around 04:00 on August 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s shoulder by hand on the ground that the victim made a bad speech; (b) continuously told the victim, who was under the influence of alcohol, that the victim was “I am dyped to dyp. h. h. h. h. h. h.; (c) obstructed the chest part by hand; and (d) fryed the chest part of the chest part by hand, frying it into both arms, and fling it over the future, and assaulted the victim.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are those falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

However, after the prosecution of this case, the victim expressed his intention that he does not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the defendant.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.