1. Around May 14, 2008, the Defendant: (a) borrowed KRW 500 million from C under the name of construction cost to be invested in the construction site of the F Building at the time when the Defendant’s wife is the representative director at the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site; (b) despite obtaining the consent of the representative director H of the G (ju) who is the contractor at the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of C to bear the joint and several liability amounting to KRW 350 million; (c) on the other hand, upon obtaining the consent of C to bear the joint and several liability amounting to KRW 50 million; (d) on May 14, 2008, the Defendant believed C to be aware of the above consent of C as to the entire obligation amounting to KRW 500 million; and (d) on the other hand, the agent’s disturbance and debt amount amount amounting to KRW 108 billion on the date of maturity 300.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant has forged a letter of delegation in the name of G, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant exercised the foregoing investigation document by issuing a letter of delegation under the name of G (owner) at the time, time, and place under paragraph (1) to C who was unaware of the forged fact, as if the document was duly formed, along with a certificate of personal seal impression in G (owner).

[2014 Highest 880]

3. On May 14, 2008, the Defendant, who forged the power of attorney in the same manner as Paragraph 1, submitted the forged power of attorney in charge of authentication in the law firm Myundong-dong L on May 14, 2008 to the said attorney-at-law in charge of authentication who did not know of the fact at the law firm Myun-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si L, so that the said attorney-at-law in charge of authentication had the said attorney-at-law in charge of authentication completed it.