However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 19, 2014, the Defendant voluntarily operated the police station E zone in Jung-Eup Police Station by a police officer who was dispatched after receiving a report at around 03:10 on May 19, 2014. The Defendant expressed that “I would like to see why I would have been suffering from damages to the business owner or why I would have been suffering from damages to the business owner.” The police officers at this time prepared the fact of damage, collected the statement, and expressed the statement to “I would like to see I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to see, I would like to say.”

Therefore, the defect that F in the process of the victim's belonging to the above district group was trying to take a photograph for smartphone in order to take a part in the defendant's act on the ground of the above act, and the defendant tried to keep the victim from selling the above G and exercising power continuously. The defendant tried to keep the victim's body together with the victim's body about four times by using the ship.

At this time, the victim tried to restrain the defendant, and the defendant suffered injury on the left side of the victim, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, because of the victim's left arms.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that a person commits a crime and makes a mistake therein, and the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment except for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in 1996 and the Road Act in 2001);

1. The dismissal of prosecution under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. The summary of the facts charged is around 02:30 on May 19, 2014.