추가상병불승인결정처분취소
1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders revocation below, shall be revoked.
Defendant.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On April 8, 2012, at around 16:00, the Plaintiff was subject to an accident falling on the ground along with the grop structure while performing the grop removal work at the construction site of the B factory located in the Gwangju Mine-gu (hereinafter “instant accident”).
B. On April 12, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an initial application for medical care with respect to the alley, salone, and salone joints of the head of a household, as indicated below, and received approval from the Defendant for the first medical care on April 17, 2012, and thereafter obtained approval for additional injury and disease medical care on eight occasions from June 11, 2012 to December 18, 2015.
On April 17, 2012, the first injury and disease in the line of duty, the first injury and disease in the line of duty on April 17, 2012, the first injury and disease in the line of duty, the first injury and disease in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty in the line of duty.
C. On September 4, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional injury and disease on the ground that “the 5th century-1,00 Textiles,” and the galleleap of a conical signboard of the 3-4-5 square meters (hereinafter “instant additional injury and disease”).
On October 2, 2015, the Defendant rendered non-approval of the above additional injury application (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that it is difficult to deem that there was a causal relationship with the instant accident due to the sedentary disease, rather than the satchological disease of the 5,00-1,00 Textiles, which was applied by the Plaintiff as an additional injury.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 2 and 5, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the disposition is lawful;
A. The plaintiff's assertion that "the 5th century - the 1,000 Textiles," among the injury and disease of this case.