However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 24, 2013, while under the influence of alcohol 0.195% during blood transfusion, the Defendant driven a car with approximately KRW 1 km from the front of the Jinyang-si's new road in Gyeonggi-do to the front of the church in front of the same Eup's salary class from the Jin-si's new road in Gyeonggi-do to the front of the church in the same Eup's salary class.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an appraisal response, a report on detection of a primary driver (blood collection result);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44-2 (Selection of Imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the sentencing conditions of the instant records and arguments, including the following circumstances, Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by taking into account all of the sentencing conditions shown in the instant records and arguments.

Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant had a record of being punished for a fine twice due to drinking driving, etc., but was also driving a drinking.

The Defendant did not comply with the request to attend several times to investigate the instant crime in order to investigate the instant crime.

The favorable circumstances: the defendant recognizes his mistake and reflects his mistake.